Search for: "Hussain v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
From Friday's Third Circuit decision in Pacira Biosciences, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
(State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:31 am
Hussain v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeTestifying Defendant's Right to Consult Lawyer Clarified in Light of Rulings in 'Geders', 'Leeke' United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
On Wednesday 17 January 2024, judgment was handed down in Mir v Hussain & Ors [2024] EWHC 56 (KB). [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
And the Court has again relisted Hussain v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hussain v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Also hanging on this week is Hussain v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:50 pm
Then again, is not quite what Justice White was talking about in his concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Circuit’s opinions in Hussain v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
(relisted after the February 21, February 28, March 7, March 21, March 28, and April 4 Conferences) Hussain v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Hussain v Sandwell MBC [2017] EWHC 1641 (Admin)(Green J). [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Detention: In Ali v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm
Hussain, 972 F.3d 1138, 1143–45 (9th Cir. 2020); United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
Hot on their heels is Hussain v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This situation arose in the very recent case of R v Hussain [2010] EWCA Crim 94 – a case which attracted significant media attention. [read post]
