Search for: "I.S. V. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 17,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2019, 11:21 am
ATI Technologies ULC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:07 am
In the upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:07 am
In the upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 11:21 am
ATI Technologies ULC v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
Is the United States’ Nonobviousness Test ‘Plausibly’ Similar to the EPO/UK Inventive Step Standard?
4 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
” Sandoz Limited v. [read post]
Is the United States’ Nonobviousness Test ‘Plausibly’ Similar to the EPO/UK Inventive Step Standard?
4 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
” Sandoz Limited v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:54 pm
See Eminence Capital, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm
The first prong of Hillard is objective -- whether the police or State agent made a threat, promise or inducement, i.e., that is not, as a matter of routine, done for all suspects. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:16 am
The post Case Preview: R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport & Anor appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:05 am
"waters of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
1 May 2007, 5:54 am
It also stated "Court will," (then in handwriting) "impose an active cap of no more than 3 years. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
The NC Court of Appeals, in a published opinion (i.e., the opinion is binding precedent), got egg on its face in the case of Bryan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
Texas v. [read post]
