Search for: "IMS Health Inc. V. Sorrell" Results 61 - 80 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 11:52 am by Monroe Freedman
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, where the Court (6-3) struck down a Vermont restriction on solicitation involving the use of pharmaceutical records to market brand-named drugs. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:47 am by Shannon Landreth
IMS Health Inc., found that speech to further pharmaceutical marketing is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:19 am by Bexis
IMS Health, Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, slip op. (2011), that Sorrell undertook review in a pharmaceutical detailing case that was more rigorous than your usual Central Hudson commercial speech case (something we noted here) provides additional basis for the author's analogy to Citizens United - a non-commercial speech case.The note also discusses the U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
Mills, CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,527) and New Hampshire (IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by John Elwood
McNamee, 10-966  (held since 5/12/11 for Nicastro/Brown) IMS Health, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
IMS Health Inc. may carry more weight. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am by Kiera Flynn
Discussing Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:35 am by Berin Szoka
IMS Health Inc. striking down a Vermont law restricting marketing to doctors based on their past history of writing drug prescriptions. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:08 am by firstamendmentblogger
Today’s New York Times presents an editorial criticizing the majority opinion for making it harder to governments to protect consumers. [read post]