Search for: "IN RE: THOMAS C." Results 61 - 80 of 1,642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am by Howard Knopf
MacDonald lmacdonald@mccarthy.ca Allison Spiegel aspiegel@mccarthy.ca RE: THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA ET AL v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
In Torres, the the focus was on renewal under Section 8 that requires, and the court held that “[f]raud in obtaining renewal of a registration amounts to fraud in obtaining a registration within the meaning of section 14(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, and Part I of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:50 pm by Gene Takagi
Some Key Resources Ban on Affirmative Action: Implications, Risks, and Strategies for the Charitable Sector (Tim Cunningham, Marisa Meltebeke, Thomas C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
They’re participating, they’re parenting but they’re not using the regulatory construction that we all understand. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
In our last roundup, we reported on the detailed judgment in Re St Michael le Belfrey York [2023] ECC Yor 2 handed down on 18 August. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm by Matthias Weller
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Whether or not re-branding diversity or DEI temporarily fends off the attacks from anti-woke critics, broad diversity remains a worthwhile and legal goal.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Canon lawyer Thomas Schüller described the verdict as a “watershed in German judicial history”. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thomas once said that labeling a regulation a common carrier scheme “has no real First Amendment consequences. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:32 am
 August 8, 2023 - 11 AM: In re Molina Healthcare, Inc., Serial Nos. 90887104 and 90887134 [Refusals to register MY HEALTH PERKS and MOLINA MY HEALTH PERKS for "Providing information in the fields of health and wellness," absent a disclaimer of "HEALTH PERKS. [read post]