Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RULE 6-1(a) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS" Results 61 - 80 of 464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  One can easily doubt whether the six Catholics who comprise the current conservative majority on the Supreme Court reflect “American poli [read post]
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[6]Those competing visions reflexively drive the interpretive approaches that dictate which history and which traditions to adopt—in Dobbs, a supermajority adopted an originalism that somehow excluded the history of slavery and its ongoing consequences, as well as the Constitution’s Reconstruction Amendments meant to address it, as Professor Michelle Goodwin has powerfully pointed out.[7]And both sides reveal competing accounts of the otherwise… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Though Novak was trained as a historian, he is currently a law professor, and, like so many of the members of this guild, is committed to making normative claims that might gain traction in the courts. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare,[7] so long as they are genuinely held and not misleading when considered in their full context. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
(The challengers have appealed Raffensperger’s decision in the state courts, while Greene is appealing the federal court ruling refusing to bar the challenge before Raffensperger’s office.) [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
On March 25, 2021, the UK Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's ruling against Plaintiff and denied his application for permission to appeal. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  These results reflect the randomness of when Supreme Court vacancies arise under our current system, and the counter-majoritarian aspects of the Senate as presently constituted (and operating now under quite broken norms of conduct), as well as the effects of the two-Senators per state rule on the Electoral College. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court may therefore choose to certify to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals (see W. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court, it would mean four women would simultaneously serve for the first time in its 233-year history, as close to gender parity as possible on the nine-person bench. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
He admitted to 11 different violations of House rules, leading to a formal reprimand. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
Supreme Court has never heard a Section 3 case, and all of the lower court precedents are well over 100 years old. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Even if specific climate change exclusions are adopted, D&O insurers should tread carefully. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court amended rule 6-10.3 in response to a "Diversity & Inclusion CLE Speaker Panel Policy" that the Business Law Section of the Florida Bar adopted on September 1, 2020. [read post]