Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS"
Results 61 - 80
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
” In Re Revlon, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005).........60In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) ............... 2, 32 viiLaGrand v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Claggett: These millions of notices: what is causing this phenomenon—just a difference of opinion on legal basis? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
In re Chambers, cause number 14-02-00020-CV in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.The Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued an opinion on February 7, 2002, denying appellants’ petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am
It will be applicable to patent applications filed on or after that date (which therefore excludes patent applications that have already been filed before that date)[12]. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
A supplemental return later filed by respondents stated they had filed a return prior to the required date; that they had adopted resolutions setting aside those that had approved the project, conducted a new noise study, and prepared a new Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and that following duly noticed public proceedings the city council adopted new resolutions again approving the project. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act § 812 and Criminal Procedure Law § 530.11 were amended substantially simplify the language contained in the notice while, at the same time, expanding the breadth of information it provides. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:25 am
Smart lawyers notice when courts create tactically useful exceptions to general rules, and future lawyers will try to take advantage of those exceptions.New York created its procedure for statewide coordinated proceedings only in 2002, and the state didn't adopt rules of practice until 2003. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:30 pm
If you're interested in the subject -- and it's an interesting one -- feel free to file a brief. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 2:51 pm
From In re Adoption of L.U., decided Friday by the Pennsylvania Superior Court (in an opinion by Judge Deborah Kunselman, joined by Judges Carolyn Nichols & Daniel McCaffery): S.U. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
The patentee has 45 days after receipt of notice to file a patent infringement action. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:32 am
Sadlock to “review the updated Subscriber Agreement in full and save a copy for your files. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
Although the Rules of Appellate Procedure allow for a court to adopt a local rule permitting electronic filing, the 8th District hasn’t done so, and so the court rejected the notice as untimely. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
JC: why did Scribd adopt that tech? [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
Legislation enacted in 2003 already requires additional notices and a longer notice period. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
