Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS"
Results 61 - 80
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The Act contains an exception to those ordinary notice- and-comment procedures for “emergency temporary stand- ards. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
Though the number of filings in 2021 declined relative to the elevated number of annual filings during period 2017-2020, the number of 2021 filings was above longer-term historical annual filings levels prior to 2017, as discussed below. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
In a lengthy, but mostly unpublished, opinion filed December 16, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment rejecting a petitioner group’s CEQA, Planning and Zoning Law, and procedural due process/fair hearing challenges to the City of San Diego’s approval of a four-lane road connecting existing developments. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Even if specific climate change exclusions are adopted, D&O insurers should tread carefully. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am
Is the NHK-Fintiv Rule substantively and procedurally unlawful? [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
This joint notice procedure was prescribed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Pettingell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Their injunction can't bind Joe, so if Joe files his suit against the clerk and wins, he can re-file his SB8 lawsuits against the providers regardless of what the district court's injunction said. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Their injunction can't bind Joe, so if Joe files his suit against the clerk and wins, he can re-file his SB8 lawsuits against the providers regardless of what the district court's injunction said. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
The 9th Circuit then remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
”[11] The Department of Justice filed a notice of appeal three days later and sought to stay the injunction pending such appeal.[12] The request for stay was denied by the Fifth Circuit and then by the Supreme Court in a summary order off the Court’s “shadow docket. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Opinion Editor’s note: Following is a letter sent to the USDA’s deputy undersecretary for food safety regarding a petition filed by several consumer groups and individuals who are asking the government to declare certain types of Salmonella illegal in meat and poultry. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Government Code section 11346.1(a)(2) requires that SWRCB wait at least five working days after providing the notice of proposed emergency action before submitting the proposed action to the OAL. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Government Code section 11346.1(a)(2) requires that SWRCB wait at least five working days after providing the notice of proposed emergency action before submitting the proposed action to the OAL. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
The 9th Circuit then remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
County of Placer (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 577, held that Petitioner failed to meet its burden of showing compliance with the County’s local procedures which required Petitioners “to show it timely filed a notice of intent to appeal and timely submitted an appeal packet which specifically identified the grounds it raise[d] in this court action. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
County of Placer (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 577, held that Petitioner failed to meet its burden of showing compliance with the County’s local procedures which required Petitioners “to show it timely filed a notice of intent to appeal and timely submitted an appeal packet which specifically identified the grounds it raise[d] in this court action. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
Finally, the jury asked to re-watch the surveillance video of the shooting during its closing argument. [read post]
