Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULE 2 GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW"
Results 61 - 80
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nervo, J.), entered June 2, 2022, which granted defendants' and intervenor defendant's motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it did not present a justiciable controversy.Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Melissa ColÓn-Bosolet, Eamon P. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
P. 41(a)(2)(E). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
On remand, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled, 2-1, that UT Austin presented sufficient evidence to prove that its admissions program is narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling state interest of the educational benefits of diversity. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
” Tacitly, therefore, there is an admission that the Abbeylara amendment is effecting a great deal more change to existing law than a mere reversal of the Abbeylara judgment. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Procedural history The Clients sued appellees, asserting the following claims and requesting the following remedies in their fifth amended petition: (1) barratry and fee forfeiture, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) fraud by nondisclosure, omission, or concealment, (4) rescission, (5) unjust enrichment, (6) legal malpractice, (7) conspiracy, (8) violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (9) suspension from the practice of law and… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
Ed. 944 (1928), SCOTUS ruled that wiretapping was not protected by the privacy provisions of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The high court has recently addressed other issues affecting the practice of law, including the enforceability of attorney-client arbitration agreements and attorney immunity to civil suits by opponents in prior litigation. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Is it desirable, as a matter of public policy governing the practice of law, to remove barratry claims, legal malpractice claims and other claims of wrongful conduct brought against attorneys from the court system and divert them into private arbitration? [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Rees, No. 07-5439 Kentucky's lethal injection protocol used as its method of execution does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Clearly, traditional notions of the family must be re-examined in the search for rational and equitable social and legal policies. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
On 2 May 2016 the appellant requested a decision pursuant to Rule 112(2) EPC. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
On 2 May 2016 the appellant requested a decision pursuant to Rule 112(2) EPC. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
One argument that often comes up in such cases is that many Sikhs wear short and blunt knives as their kirpans, taking the view that the kirpan is supposed to be a symbolic weapon, not a usable one; it’s possible that exempting such knives — even if they technically violate the law or a government agency rule — wouldn’t really undermine the interest in fighting crime. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Myers Docket: 09-451 Issues: (1) Whether probable cause is required to conduct strip searches that further the overwhelmingly important interests of jail security and safety; and (2) whether the law governing visual, non-body cavity searches of jail detainees was sufficiently settled to be considered “clearly established” at the time of the search in question. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
And this just isn't a narrowly-tailored remedy for the government's past identified discrimination against individuals (or even groups).2. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
And this just isn't a narrowly-tailored remedy for the government's past identified discrimination against individuals (or even groups).2. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm
He is the President and Managing Partner of The Health Law Firm, which has a national practice. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
I-2 U 31/16). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
Whereas Rule 64(b) EPC 1973 had required "a statement identifying the decision which is impugned and the extent to which the amendment or cancellation of the decision is requested", Rule 99(1)(b) and (c) EPC only required "an indication of the decision impugned" and "a request defining the subject of the appeal".The letter of 17 March 2015 was not simply a mere debit order; it also contained an indication that it related to the filing of an… [read post]
