Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2021, 9:38 am
Harvey Randall, New York State Civil Service law scholar and author of NY Public Personnel Law https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/ mentioned that the “three looks and you’re out” is a New York City specific rule and I thank him for that correction. [read post]
17 May 2021, 9:38 am
Harvey Randall, New York State Civil Service law scholar and author of NY Public Personnel Law https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/ mentioned that the “three looks and you’re out” is a New York City specific rule and I thank him for that correction. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Is there no such thing as settled law, normally referred to as stare decisis? [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:53 am
However, that doesn’t mean that they’re ineffective. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:09 am
This presented the primary basis for the difference among states for which the court certified class actions and states for which it denied motions for class certification. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
All excellent questions. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:03 pm
Federal courts typically certify state law issues when they're presented on direct appeal and in settings in which the state courts have had no opportunity to opine on the particular issue. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Other Seventh Circuit opinions, including some by Judge Posner, focus heavily on differences in state law in finding certification inappropriate. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Supplemental briefs were filed, and the case was re-argued in July 2012. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:13 pm
The questioned passport applications include those of children of Mexican women who crossed the border to give birth in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
Such was the case in a California federal court’s recent denial of class certification in In Re Google AdWords Litigation. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:09 pm
In a nationwide class, variations in state law may swamp any common issues and defeat predominance. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
”[8] But the question remains of how Twombly’s plausibility test intersects with Hydrogen Peroxide, In re IPO,[9] and other decisions that require some delving into the merits. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
The plaintiffs sought to certify the class of Comcast subscribers in that geographical area under Rule 23(b)(3), claiming that questions of law and fact common to the class predominated over any questions affecting individual members. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:26 am
The plaintiffs filed a putative collective and class action alleging violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state labor laws. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:57 am
Harvey Randall, a New York State Civil Service law scholar and author of NY Public Personnel Law https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/ mentioned that the “three looks and you’re out” is a New York City specific rule and I thank him for that correction. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
(I did not previously post on Jimenez, but one thing I found notable about it was its reliance on state-law framing of the certification questions by citing Brinker.) [read post]
12 May 2019, 7:20 pm
“…we’re releasing a searchable database of the most cut-and-dried cases of troubled cops—30,000 officers from 44 states who were decertified by state oversight agencies. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:18 pm
This is why it’s so important to ensure you’re up to date with the latest versions of different laws in your state when you’re in the midst of or beginning to start a family law case. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified the question to that court in In re Peaselee (and also said that the bankruptcy law question should be resolved by interpretation of state law) [www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080] . [read post]
