Search for: "IN RE OKLAHOMA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 7:54 am by Eric
" * Oklahoma HB 2800: Executors can take over web accounts of the deceased [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:23 am by Donna
Have you recently provided information to, or testified before, any appropriate governmental agency, person, or entity conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into an alleged violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 pm by Jeffrey
Except, like any good rule, there's always a grey ground. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Mike
In granting habease relief to a prisoner, the Court identified - by name - the prosecutors who violated their oath of office, and their duties under the Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Paul, which struck down a city ordinance banning certain “bias-motivated” conduct. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The reason they call this a profession is because we’re supposed to be professionals. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
A federal inspection of the company’s Jesse Hunton Viola Unit, an oil field production facility in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, on November 9, 2009, found the facility’s SPCC plan did not meet federal requirements, was not certified by a professional engineer, was not approved by the company’s management and did not designate the person accountable for spill prevention. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move in the district court to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm by admin
That was the ruling the Ohio Supreme Court released Wednesday. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Kevin Conrad, executive director of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations and a special envoy for Papua New Guinea, said in an interview that while Obama has improved the rhetoric, “when you look at what they’re proposing, it’s absolutely unimpressive. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Jackson, a major 1986 ruling on the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),Grand (IP)… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Conway, No. 06-4083 "A sentence pursuant to a plea to possession of ammunition is affirmed over challenges to the district court's possession-of-a-shotgun enhancement arguing that: 1) he did not possess the shotgun; 2) the "relevant conduct" provisions of the sentencing guidelines do not apply to this conduct; 3) the sentencing guidelines preclude courts from enhancing sentences based on charged conduct where the government later dismisses the charge in… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
A REVIEW OF PUBLIC, UNDISPUTED FACTSFROM MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS REVEALS A"PERVASIVE LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM" INTHE DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOCOLS AND THESELECTION, TRAINING, AND OVERSIGHT OFEXECUTION TEAM MEMBERS................................. 8A. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
QUESTIONS PRESENTEDii LIST OF PARTIESPursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.1(b), the following list identifies all of the parties before theKentucky Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm by Robert Bennett
” There is nothing on his website about the Tulia cases or his numerous violations of the Professional Conduct Rules. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:39 am
However, such rebukes usually come with a bit more explanation than the "we're right and you're not" quality of the initial Blog 702 comment.Anyway, we made a request that they kindly tell us why we're full of it a little more fulsomely. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]