Search for: "IN RE REVISION OF PORTION OF RULES OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Act, a petitioner may seek judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit of those portions of the petition which EPA denied. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Defendants request that the Court reconsider the portion of Judge Levi’s order regarding the divisibility of harm defense. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Defendants request that the Court reconsider the portion of Judge Levi’s order regarding the divisibility of harm defense. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
While much of this ground is familiar to criminal procedure scholars, it is worth re-examining in light of Justice Stevens’ imminent departure from the Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:39 pm
The report was revised and finalized in July 2009, but was then subjected to review by an Associate Deputy Attorney General (David Margolis) and was rejected. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Earlier in 2009, Corn Plus paid a penalty totaling $150,000 to resolve a criminal water quality charge brought by the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Earlier in 2009, Corn Plus paid a penalty totaling $150,000 to resolve a criminal water quality charge brought by the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The Administrator is hereby providing public notice of this proposed Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO), and providing an opportunity for interested persons to comment on the CWA, EPCRA, RCRA, and CAA portions of this Consent Agreement, in accordance with CWA sections 309(g)(4)(A) and 311(b)(6) [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
” Click Here Appeals court to rule on landfill restrictions. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here Southwest Missouri Pet Supply Dealer to Pay $56,632 Penalty for Re-Labeling, Selling Misbranded Cattle and Hog Insecticide. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here Southwest Missouri Pet Supply Dealer to Pay $56,632 Penalty for Re-Labeling, Selling Misbranded Cattle and Hog Insecticide. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:15 pm
Tim Moore, R-Cleveland, another sponsor and a lawyer, said the General Assembly is unlikely to revise the law unless the state Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court concurs with Baddour's ruling. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Cason declared Tuesday, “I am not a criminal. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:51 am
 Under the proposed rule, the appellate court's decision doesn't get journalized until the motion for reconsideration is ruled on; in other words, if you file a timely motion for reconsideration, the 45 days for filing an appeal to the Supreme Court doesn't begin to run until the court of appeals rules on your motion. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
A lynch mob formed for the purpose of attacking the Chinatown portion of the city. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
But, as discussed in more detail in the next section, it also likely reflects a priority on bringing cases against individuals more quickly, without settlements and without awaiting the result of possible parallel criminal investigations. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of New York announced the criminal indictment of the two former portfolio managers.[14] In September 2008, the SEC filed civil charges against two brokers in connection with purchases for customers of more than $1 billion in auction rate securities. [read post]
