Search for: "IN RE THE ADOPTION OF C W D"
Results 61 - 80
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Compared to 2(d) refusals, just really low. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
As he points out, we don’t generally even ask if protecting ideas would get us more ideas b/c ideas aren’t w/in scope of copyright. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 11:51 am
We thank Sharon D. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Christine Haight Farley: If you’re investigating policy impact, Byron is an outlier b/c he is an incredibly successful author, which means his strategies will be different. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
Any step can be iterative w/in itself and w/other steps. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:30 pm
Exclusivity b/c of tacit knowledge and employee mobility restrictions too. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.430(d). 5 Fla. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Similarly, exacerbates tension on First Amendment interests b/c we have a merchandising claim at work—Court’s intuition that he should win does real damage to Rogersby finding the use artistically relevant, but also finding that b/c we’re in the same (merchandising) market, it might be explicitly misleading even though the defendant isn’t doing anything explicitly misleading.Porous markets: Excelled Sheepskin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
Michael W. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:30 am
Thanks to Donald W. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:28 am
” Thus, the district court concluded that “[d]efendants, when they re-published the matters in evidence, had the same duties and liabilities for re-publishing libelous material as the author of such materials. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
Moreover, encourage other female in-house counsel to adopt a similar approach. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Need to vividly expose the courts to the public for whom the D stands, though that didn’t work w/composers etc in Golan and Eldred. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:18 am
by Sharon D. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
See 26 U.S.C sections 401(a)(9)(C)(i), 408(d)(1). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Supp.2d 880, 892-93 (D. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Intentional copying by D often leads to presumption of secondary meaning. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Real problem is at the C&D stage. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
re extent of postpet. pre-rejection rent due under §365(d)(3). http://t.co/N49wR3O B-TX adopts 4th Cir. [read post]
