Search for: "IN RE THOMAS D." Results 61 - 80 of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
"] In re Cuts Clothing, Inc., Serial No. 90880357 (April 4, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm by Jennifer Koh
§ 1326(d), was enacted by Congress after the court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
 Sure, I could see a Scalia or a Thomas writing the thing -- as long as you added lots of additional insults and vitriol. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:23 pm by Elie Mystal
Even if all the allegations against the school are true, TJSL would be guilty of doing what a bunch of other law schools do; they’d just be the first to get called out in a court for such behavior.And speaking of things that kind of happen everywhere, we’re learning today of a more mundane lawsuit filed against Thomas Jefferson. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:56 am
Joseph Barton applied to register BARTON FAMILY WINERY for "wine" [WINERY disclaimed], but the USPTO refused registration under Section 2(d) on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark THOMAS BARTON for "alcoholic beverages, namely, wines. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:13 am
”] In re Forage Holdings LLC, Serial No. 87561681 (July 2, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Alfred Brophy
I want to talk a little bit about my visit to the Thomas Jackson cemetery in Lexington a couple of weeks back. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:06 am
This would give Senators an incentive to abuse — not that they need more incentive — every nominee put up by a President who isn't a member of their party.Quite aside from Thomas, we're all able to read that account and use it to judge Joe Biden. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m going to kick in, of course, but I’d be reluctant to ask Rob Thomas or Kristin Bell to follow me on Twitter. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
"I'd like to think that a religious person has a strong moral core that would preclude that kind of dishonesty, but we're not required to give religious nominees a pass and presume they're more honest than nominees who are not religious devotees. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
In re Morgan, No. 07-70201 (10-9-07). [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:12 am
  If you're a fan of military history - especially sea battles - this book is not to be missed. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:50 am
[Results in first comment].In re TdeltaS Limited, Serial No. 79282075 (March 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]