Search for: "IN RE WYETH"
Results 61 - 80
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
Wyeth, 2009 WL 736208 (W.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:52 am
No. 139055A. [4] See In re Hyon, 679 F.3d 1363 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:37 pm
Imposing liability on a brand name manufacturer based on the ingestion of a generic version of a drug fundamentally alters the Hatch-Waxman tradeoff and is therefore preempted under a conflict preemption theory.We're still kicking this around, and we're not sure either of these musings gets us anywhere, but we figured we'd share them with our readers. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
The Phenergan label had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1955 and re-approved in the 1980s. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:23 am
A couple of weeks ago, we linked to Part One of Anthony Sebok and Benjamin Zipursky's Findlaw article about Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Wyeth, Inc., 168 Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:41 am
Links: PTA Statistics Patent Maintenance Fee Payments USPTO Re-Calculating PTA Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litig. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:57 am
The main event of the High Court’s fall term — Monday’s oral argument in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
Suffice it to say that we're disappointed. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:54 am
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm
We’re pleased – but perplexed. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 12:30 am
Wyeth, 536 F. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:40 pm
Thus, we're told, Wyeth agreed with plaintiffs that the Supreme Court should grant cert. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:36 am
But then again, we'll be going through another round of layoffs as soon as Wyeth is devoured. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
On some days, we're writing about how Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
This re-affirmed rule will become particularly important as these types of suits increase. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, MDL-1507 (E.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:11 pm
Wyeth, slip op., 2009 WL 635415 (W.D. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
Nor can it mean that plaintiffs can re-cast all of their run-of-the-mill claims as "negligence per se" and so avoid preemption. [read post]
