Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF E.G., Minor Child, E.G., Minor Child, Appellant."
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
E.g., 6-ER-972-73. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
It breached the rights of E and her sisters under e.g. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Boiled down, all the statutory presumption says is that some (unspecified) involvement is in a child’s best interests (unless it’s not). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
The verdict of the higher regional court of Bremen as appellate court had to consider the precedent of the ECJ. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The Appellate Divison affirmed. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
See, e.g., Kellam v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:22 pm
See, e.g., Kellam v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
"[xvi] What about Child Trespassers? [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:18 am
See, e.g., Fla. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:26 am
Duties include: (1) Adhering to the Tribal Code, presiding over, hearing and determining all types of cases filed in the Tribal Court, including but not limited to: criminal, traffic, civil (e.g. domestic relations, probate, repossession, breach of contract, personal injury), juvenile, and child welfare cases (e.g. neglect, dependency, delinquency, truancy); (2) Working with the Court Administrator in the development of a Court budget and maintenance of the case docket;… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
See, e.g., Bank of Maui v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Bar and the National Child Labor Committee. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Of Corrections, 282 Ga. 754, 653 S.E.2d 740 (2007) "Although we earlier determined appellant's property interest in his rent-free residence at his parents' home to be 'minimal,' Mann, supra, 278 Ga. at 443 (2), we find appellant's property interest in the Hibiscus Court residence he purchased with his wife to be significant. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
See e.g., Spleen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:30 pm
He then asks about unrelated matters (e.g., "You don't have any dead bodies in your car? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm
See, e.g. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
The SoS’s decision struck a fair balance between the appellants’ rights and the interests of the UK community as a whole. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
Because there was no dispute that the defendants were the parents of the child in question, and that the child was less than 16 years old, the only element in dispute was whether defendants “created or allowed to be created a substantial risk of physical injury” for the child. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Nor did the Ministry question the validity of the appellants’ respective marriages. [85] On this basis alone, the appellants’ respective marriages should have been recognised by the Ministry for the purpose of [the applicable legislation] and [the appellants] are to be regarded as spouse for the purpose of the [applicable legislation][…] VI. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
E.g., 6-ER-972-73. [read post]
