Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF RULES FOR PUBLIC A"
Results 61 - 80
of 48,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 12:50 pm
The Ninth Circuit ruled that a public agency did not violate the First Amendment when it prohibited an employee from speaking to coworkers on matters related to the employee's alleged misconduct while an investigation was pending. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am
The post High Court Ruling Affects Public-Sector Unions appeared first on HRWatchdog by Gail Cecchettini Whaley. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court has ruled, 8-1, that the First Amendment protects speakers on matters of public concern, even at funerals. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
As well as dealing with remuneration matters for listed companies (background here), the Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Bill 2011 will, if passed, introduce a new “no vacancy” rule which will affect this year’s election of directors for all public companies. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of World Trade Ctr. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of World Trade Ctr. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm
The City does argue that Spencer's speech was not a matter of public concern. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:43 pm
For the contractors, subcontractors and design professionals that are retained by private entities with leases on public properties – a common circumstance in airports, cruise ports and train/rail stations – this ruling brings some much-needed protection to help ensure payment. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
The general rule is that public employees have limited rights to speak on matters of public concern if, and only if, they are speaking as a citizen and not pursuant to their official job duties. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 10:46 am
When it is presented as a matter of state policy choice (law), 62% favor allowing concealed carry of handguns with a permit … Continue reading "State Gun Laws And Public Opinion" [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:21 pm
Rule 1.10(b) says that after a lawyer leaves a firm, it may handle a matter adverse to a client the departed lawyer had represented at the firm unless : "(1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and (2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am
The district court ruled for the department. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
Petro discusses rules public officials must know to avoid corruption charges for "official acts. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:29 am
A public reprimand has been imposed on an attorney by the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers for violation of Rule 4.2. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
There is a Rule in the District of Columbia that permits reinstatement of disbarred attorneys without any public notice or hearing if the petition is not opposed by Disciplinary Counsel. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
" Ultimately, the Court’s message was clear: if you’re a government official conducting the public’s business, those are public records, no matter where those records are stored. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
For those interested in knowing why jurors are rarely punished, save for public embarrassment, for conducting internet research, I highly recommend reading In the Matter of Lawrence Toppin, a recent opinion by Judge Peter E. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 1:21 pm
New Military Rules of Evidence publication The Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) are published by the President in the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
Context matters. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
So why does this matter? [read post]
