Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT, ETC. " Results 61 - 80 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mindy S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:38 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
The notice under Section 13(2) is not appealable under Section 17 of the Act, as that section provides an appeal only against the measures taken under Section 13(4) of the Act. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Glenn Cohen
  Can Oceanic claim issue preclusion against Kate on the matter of the airline’s negligence? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
In Ashok Kumar Mittal, this Court pointed out that present system of levying meagre costs in civil matters (or no costs in some matters), is wholly unsatisfactory and does not act as a deterrent to vexatious or luxury litigation borne out of ego or greed, or resorted to as a `buying-time' t [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Aditya Bandopadhyay, has examined the relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act while deciding a matter relating to the denial of right of right of inspection and re-evaluation of question papers by the Central Board of Secondary Education. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
The bottom layer consists of a First-tier Tribunal, which is organised into chambers according to subject matter (e.g. the Social Entitlement Chamber, the Tax Chamber, the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber etc.). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The determination of a claim of political motivation is distinct from the determination of application of the political offense exception, which will continue to be made by the U.S. judiciary, consistent with U.S. law. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
The control questions are irrelevant to the facts being investigated but they are intended to provoke distinct physiological responses, as well as false denials. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
The plaintiff unsuccessfully appealed that decision to both the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals and the Medicare Appeals Council. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:37 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  On appeal, Hartford challenged the propriety of the court's order remanding the matter to the arbitration panel for clarification of its award. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(The trustees, executors etc. settled before trial.) [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by William L. Pfeifer, Jr.
(f) The petitioner failed to appeal within the prescribed time from the conviction or sentence itself or from the dismissal or denial of a petition previously filed pursuant to this rule and that failure was without fault on the petitioner’s part. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
That went to appeal, as well as denying Shure noninfringement JMOL for its barbed nozzle earphones, and denying laches. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:04 am by velvel
This is my fault for putting such crucial matters at the end (for reasons I won’t get into here), but it could nevertheless be the fact. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm by velvel
As one whose practice, for decades, revolved around Supreme Court cases, court of appeals cases and trial court cases involving major antitrust matters, I do not ever remember hearing or reading of remarks like Sheehan’s being made in open court. [read post]