Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 61 - 80
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2021, 7:28 am
Precisely because consumer advocates like Professor Sovern and the plaintiffs’ class action bar for years have poisoned the well by repeatedly denigrating arbitration as an unfair and abusive practice – even though the statistics show otherwise. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:54 pm
Do the plaintiffs have a case? [read post]
24 May 2021, 7:34 am
District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Boston certified classes of both direct purchasers, including drug wholesalers, and indirect purchasers, such as health plans and insurance companies. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:27 am
Thus, what EUIPO has proven is an indirect and unobvious link between “HELL” and coffee. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:24 am
To certify a class on behalf of all investors who purchased shares during the class period, plaintiffs usually invoke a presumption of reliance created by the Court in the Basic case. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 4:10 am
State law divides such offenses into six offense levels starting from a class 1 misdemeanor and leading to a class 2 felony. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:32 pm
Independent contractors are a unique class of visitors that do not fall precisely within any of the classifications. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 3:35 am
At the same time, Google seeks to shot down a consolidated class action complaint brought on behalf of some smaller app developers.Google also faces class actions by consumers. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
, and the plaintiffs get to re-plead . . . well, maybe. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm
On September 11, 2020, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York against GOL, and certain of its officers on behalf of a class of investors who purchased the company’s securities during the period March 14, 2019 through July 22, 2020. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:36 pm
By the way, there is a discovery dispute between Apple and counsel for the plaintiffs in the earlier-filed class actions over whether any documents Apple provided to the European Commission must be produced in the private U.S. antitrust actions in the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
ZTE framework and ignored Daimler's suppliers' right to a component-level license under EU antitrust law, is not going to be reviewed anymore.For 86% of Daimler's German sales, an exhaustive component-level license agreement between Sharp and Daimler's indirect supplier Huawei had actually mooted the whole matter. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
US plaintiff firms continue to targ [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Apple is a consumer class action that started in 2011 and went all the way up to the Supreme Court, a 5-4 majority of which allowed it to go forward despite earlier SCOTUS case law (Illinois Brick) denying consumers the right to claim indirect antitrust damages.Cameron v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm
Under the bill, punitive damages would only be available if the plaintiff establishes willful misconduct. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 2:19 pm
The tour operator removed the case to federal court, where it was certified as a class action. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:15 am
Seeking class certification in the district court, the plaintiffs invoked the Basic presumption to show that common issues of fact predominated. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Additionally, the GSA issued the Memorandum for GSA Contracting Activities: FAR and GSAR Class Deviation – Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (Aug. 13, 2019). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
This does not mean, however, that indirect purchaser class actions can or should never be certified. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Sufficient association is “generally” proven if:One employer is acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the other employer in relation to the employee; orThere is an arrangement between those employers to share the employee’s services; orThe employers share direct or indirect control over the employee because one employer controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the other employer.Under these two tests, a broad category of… [read post]
