Search for: "ING Direct Investing Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Should Canada head in the same direction as other countries? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  A holding that the three corporations at issue here--Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Mardel, Inc., and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Ag Supply Inc. v Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’l Inc., where the judges examined the relationship between the Plant Variety Protection Act and the Patent Act, establishing that inventors should be rewarded with a patent and explaining that only a patent holder could prevent purchasers of a protected seed from saving harvested seeds for replanting. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 4:58 am
  ING thus was the only direct shareholder in each of the respective underlying mutual funds. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) proposed a bill that excluded violations of computer use policies and terms of service agreements from “exceed[ing] authorized access” in violation of the statute. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by William McGrath
Rajaratnam claimed that he pieced together information from a variety of sources to reach a decision on investing. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Metabolite Labs., Inc., 548 U.S. 124, 127 (2006) (Breyer, J., dissenting from dismissal of petition). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Put simply, section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) grants the SEC the power to sanction a broker-dealer and its associated persons for “fail[ing] reasonably to supervise” another person, subject to his or her supervision, who has violated the 1934 Act.[4] The provision in the 1934 Act for failure to supervise parallels sections 203(e) and (f) of the Investment Advisers Act which applies to investment advisers. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:58 am by Josh Wright
The Department of Justice intervened, culminating in rules prohibiting any CRS owned by an airline from ordering listings “us[ing] any factors directly or indirectly relating to carrier identity” (14 CFR 255.4). [read post]