Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:44 am
Where, as here "[an application] claims a structure already known in the prior art that is altered by the mere substitution of one element for another known in the field, the combination must do more than yield a predictable result," KSR, 127 S.Ct. at 1740, 82 USPQ2d at 1395 (citing United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:53 am
See People of State of Cal. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 11:36 am
The Act was introduced in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
It can be any word, symbol, name or device or any combination thereof used by a person other than its owner or one where the owner of the mark maintains a bona fide intent to permit others to use the mark in commerce and the owner registers the mark on the Principal Register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
At an HTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
Internet access device. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:43 pm
Intellectual Science and Technology v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
In the United States, about 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events occur every year. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:45 am
Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks, considers Dr. [read post]
