Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has just published its appellate opinion in the Google Books case.Early last year I wrote that I had initially been rather skeptical of Google's "fair use" argument relating to Google Books, but ultimately I found myself in agreement with Google. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm
This is also consistent with Form 18, which requires identification of the product or device alleged to infringe on the patent. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Right now, Congress and most states have not enacted statutes to regulate how law enforcement can get access to the tracking data kept in more than 322 million smartphones and cellular phones in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
In the past year, several Federal Circuit decisions defined situations in which software inventions could be eligible for patenting in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:44 am
Where, as here "[an application] claims a structure already known in the prior art that is altered by the mere substitution of one element for another known in the field, the combination must do more than yield a predictable result," KSR, 127 S.Ct. at 1740, 82 USPQ2d at 1395 (citing United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:53 am
See People of State of Cal. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
Special Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 11:36 am
The Act was introduced in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
It can be any word, symbol, name or device or any combination thereof used by a person other than its owner or one where the owner of the mark maintains a bona fide intent to permit others to use the mark in commerce and the owner registers the mark on the Principal Register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
At an HTC v. [read post]
