Search for: "In INTEREST OF DH v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:43 pm
For his part, the President has defended the proposal stating that he has the best interest of the children in mind given that undocumented families will be discouraged from traveling to the United States with the passage of this rule. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
See, e.g., Poe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm
ShareOn Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:48 am
On August 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
Also, in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
DHS ignored DACA recipients’ reliance interests when deciding to rescind the program. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:15 am
Dep’t of State (D.D.C.) [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 11:56 am
This lawsuit aims to protect the right to protest,” said Houston Davidson, EFF public interest legal fellow. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:57 am
In Philadelphia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:23 am
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
However, on December 2, 2016, the Sheriff issued a new policy under which inmates subject to either an ICE detainer accompanied by a United States Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter DHS) Warrant for Arrest of Alien, and/or DHS Warrant of Removal/Deportation, are to be held for up to 48 hours after the time they would otherwise have been released, with ICE to be notified immediately. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Baby Girl], and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals [Neilson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
Mother v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
Mother v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
Mother v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations: A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
"] From Mahendra v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
