Search for: "In Interest of DED"
Results 61 - 63
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 12:48 am
A casual reference in the government's briefs alone may not satisfy the Hahn notice requirement before an upward departure is imposed (although the Hahn PSR's silence on the departure issue is a worrisome fact that will muddy future notice analyses).For Further Reading: For an interesting and useful discussion of Rule 32 notice requirements in the post-Booker world, see Sentencing Resource Counsel Amy Baron-Evan's memo, "After Irizarry: . . . [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:58 am
" CIBA Specialty Chemicals Corporation v. 3V Inc., 1-06-cv-00672 (DED November 19, 2008, Opinion) [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:51 am
(Worthless Stock Ded.: Liquid'g Distrib'n Was Only on Pfd Stock)6. [read post]