Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARMS v. Harms" Results 61 - 80 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 7:41 pm by Brad Pauley
  The Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four, held in a published decision, In re Marriage of Green, 205 Cal.App.4th 1475, that credit purchased during marriage was community property, and remanded the case to the trial court to consider allocation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:05 am by Matthew Harwood
And many of us are living the commitment at the core of marriage and are harmed when the law treats us as legal strangers. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:56 pm by Dale Carpenter
[For the most part, supporters of Mississippi's abortion ban in the Supreme Court are steering clear of Obergefell] Eugene's re-posting of Professor Stephen Gilles' argument about Obergefell v. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
I am currently conducting research to determine whether coercive control can be considered psychological harm for the purpose of the future harm exception to confidentiality and solicitor-client privilege.[1] My research is supported by the OBA Fellowship in Legal Ethics and Professionalism Studies. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
As readers of this blog very likely know, ADF represented Proposition 22 Legal Defense & Education Fund in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (2008). [read post]