Search for: "In Re: Blair v." Results 61 - 80 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
 With particular regard to the re-creation of copyright-protected works (as it would have been the case of Selma, should Oyelowo/King had reproduced actual extracts from King's speeches), it is worth recalling the recent (2014) decision of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in Arrow Productions v The Weinstein Company.As readers might remember, this case concerned Deep Throat's Linda Lovelace biopic,… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The strikes may be important in one other key and often unconsidered way – they’re boosting the morale of fighters on the ground. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Blair J.A., dissenting, would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:55 am by JD Hull
Do see DSM-IV or the newer DSM-V for yourself to see what they are, and see how you and your friends rate. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/lSu3tO9CkA -> Google says Java APIs lost copyrightability like Aspirin lost trademark protection over time http://t.co/G3o1IubgdK -> The Federal Circuit has set the stage for granting Apple an injunction against Samsung http://t.co/JjwIib4Db3 -> Protecting IP Rights http://t.co/3QglFXeUGW -> Dennis Blair and Jon Huntsman: Protect U.S. intellectual property rights http://t.co/2DEVYShVvW -> Google Reader Woes Update http://t.co/ebVryYkYFs -> Tech Law Summit 2013… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Keith Alexander replied, “On those, you’re starting to get closer to what would be [considered war]” (Harris, 2009, brackets in original). [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:19 am by John L. Welch
In re Vertex Group LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1694 (TTAB 2009) [TTABlogged here]; Nextel Communications v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Yes, Strasbourg endorsed that finding five years later in A v UK (2009) but it is the Belmarsh judgment that led to the withdrawal of Part IV, and which still stands as a precedent binding on lower courts. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
CCO Investment Services Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., which is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland, and in substantial part, operates from kiosks located in traditional retail bank branch offices of Citizens Bank. [read post]