Search for: "In Re: E. B., a Minor" Results 61 - 80 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:14 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Furthermore, by that point, the children will be re-acclimated to life in Germany and to the care of Petitioner. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[But] even assuming there were no "leak" of C.D.'s identity as the case proceeded, "[b]eing 're-exposed' to the perceived wrong [of which he complains] is an inevitable consequence of litigation itself. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a Brookings Institution report, Brookings’s Sanjay Patnaik, Director of the Center on Regulation and Markets, and Robert E. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Following Working Families I, the Ontario legislature had re-enacted the legislation with the inclusion of section 33 of the Charter, prompting the challenge under section 3. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
More breaking news on the Fifth Circuit's e-cigarette docket: the FDA's denial of an application to market menthol-flavored e-cigarettes is stayed. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
In short, the Law Society’s position is: (a) it is entirely proper to report a minor breach (barring confidentiality issues) because it might be indicative of more serious concerns, and (b) if you’re still not sure, ask the Law Society. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to rank-and-file lawmakers, Republican senators largely rejected Fox personality Tucker Carlson’s vision of the deadly insurrection as a mostly peaceful protest that involved little violence. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
As detailed in a pair of previous posts, the mainstream historical tradition for controversial arms such Bowie knives and slungshots was to forbid concealed carry, to restrict sales to minors (especially without parental consent), or to impose extra punishment for misuse. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm by Jacob Tingen
If you’re married to a member of the U.S. military, you might qualify to adjust because of something called “parole in place. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
., 68 AD3d 1009 [2d Dept 2009] [“Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying” respondent’s untimely buyout election]; In re Flushing Off. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
An way one looks at it, the situation in Cuba produces far more cynicism than it does either hope or re¡course to some saving ideology. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See In re Erie COVID-19 Business Interruption Protection Insurance Litigation, No. 1:21-mc-1 (W.D. [read post]