Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It strikes me that NYU’s motto is particularly appropriate for the topic at hand:  Perstare et praestare. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 26, 2011  Dickow v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Aramark Foods; 2000 Jury Verdicts LEXIS 60403 Lucasfilm Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:11 am by Steven M. Gursten
Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company, et al., rank right up there with the worst auto insurance companies in Michigan. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
P. 6(e)(3)(E)(i), pertaining to the disclosure of grand jury documents, cannot be used to mandate such release. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
We end the Article by analyzing the meaning of “predecessor in interest” for purposes of Rule 804(b)(1), and also whether exculpatory grand jury testimony is admissible against the government under that same rule. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  The case, In Re Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation (US DC NJ) MDL No. 2875 (RBK)is a products liability case that concerns the sale in the U.S. of generic, prescription Valsartan pharmaceuticals, found by the Food and Drug Administration [“FDA”] to contain cancer‐causing contaminants. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
., et al., ("the Debtors") during the pendency of the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]