Search for: "In Re: Rochester v."
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 6:05 am
Robertelli v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:10 pm
Some of these questions were answered in Harleysville Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:32 pm
Wichelhaus and Sherwood v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:11 am
According to the respondents, the certiorari petition contended that the appellate court exceeded Congress’s authorizing statute by extending a private right of action for proxy solicitation shareholders onto tender offer shareholders (Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:38 am
Last week, in Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP, ___ AD3d ___, 2021 NY Slip Op 02956 [4th Dept May 7, 2021], a Rochester-based appeals court issued a decision affirming Justice Walker’s post-trial decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
See, e.g., Univ. of Rochester v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:20 pm
In Joffe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:49 am
” The court explained that it was declining to re-write the rule and instead deferred to the legislature to “take any additional action deemed necessary. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
In Bartis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:07 am
v=6Cf7IL_eZ38. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 4:08 pm
COL 4 - Betsy Markey v Marilyn Musgrave. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
In Bartis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Top-Free Rights for Women in New York: People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Dangler (Rochester, NY)Atlantic v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Court of Appeals, Brunner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
For example, in Gac v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
