Search for: "In Re: Stamps, et al"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
An interesting analysis by Prof. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 8:50 am
(pix credit; here)The Statement on Visit to the USA, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights has just been posted to the UN's website. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
They’re free? [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:19 am
As one can imagine many of the positions of the CECC are critical of current Chinese policies and institutions (for some analysis see CECC).For some time CECC has focused on the way that Chinese central authorities have sought to put their own normative stamp on the relation of religion to both state organs and to the ruling ideology from which the political community of which religious communities form a part, draw authority and measure the legitimacy of their actions. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
On September 15, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court will sit in Houston, TX (University of Houston Law Center) to hear oral argument on whether a payday lender may divert a class action filed against it over its practice of pursuing the collection of defaulted civil debts through criminal prosecution with bad-debt affidavits in violation of Texas law. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
The articles on digital evidence presume that the digital evidence can be clearly identifiable as the original when in fact it is seldom that digital evidence is not changed to the extent that it is automatically re-formatted on the recipient machine. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
ATT Mobility, et al. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Over a century later, Hall is being celebrated by the release of a stamp by Canada Post today. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
We the People did not want to see any more ads and money wasted on ads, be it from Chrysler, et al, or from your own pocket. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
The key provisions of the 1933 Act are Section 11, which establishes that any purchaser of a security may bring a private action for damages against the issuer if the registration statement is false or misleading,[3] and Section 12(a)(2), which similarly establishes a private right of action against any person who offers or sells a security through a prospectus or oral communication that is false or misleading.[4] The key provision of the 1934 Act is Section 10(b), which, along with Securities and… [read post]
