Search for: "In Re: United States of America, Petitioner"
Results 61 - 80
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
USPAP Professional appraisers and courts throughout North America generally accept USPAP as the leading standard. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 1:28 pm
Petitioner’s response here was that Congress wanted to keep the term “on sale” to retain much the underlying jurisprudence around it (such as the “ready for patenting” test) while abrogating certain outlier Federal Circuit cases like In re Caveney and Special Devices, which deemed secret sales to be patent-barring. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the October 12 conference) United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
If promulgated, the change would deny eligibility for an immigrant visa, green card through adjustment of status, nonimmigrant visas, and entry to the United States by broadening a statutory ground of inadmissibility for a noncitizen who is “likely at any time to become a public charge. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
If promulgated, the change would deny eligibility for an immigrant visa, green card through adjustment of status, nonimmigrant visas, and entry to the United States by broadening a statutory ground of inadmissibility for a noncitizen who is “likely at any time to become a public charge. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) held oral argument in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
The petitioner had argued that the “statute is unconstitutional because it does not also require the State to prove the property owner knew or should have known of the illegal conduct. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
The petitioner argues that the plain language of the America Invents Act excludes from prior art inventions that, by agreement, are kept secret. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
” Through some twist of fate, the Old Dominion is home to America’s largest domestic uranium deposits. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:46 am
Brohl, a Colorado case related to state sales and use taxes, Kennedy called for the court to re-examine Bellas Hess and Quill. [read post]
