Search for: "In Re A.H"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
They're conservative down there, right? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
A.H. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
A.H. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
One of the ways we feed this blog is doing what comes naturally to us lawyers - reading recent cases - and hoping that something inspires us. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:18 am
(Court documents include only their initials, A.H. and J.G.W., so we're using these pseudonyms to make this story a little easier to read.) [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
So we like to think that by this time we're familiar with all the arguments, pro and con. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
A.H. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
See In re C.C., 788 N.E.2d at 850-52. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
A.H. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 12:59 pm
A.H., an 11-page, 3-2 decision, Justice Sullivan writes:Our Trial Rule 75(A) gives preference to certain counties as the place for a lawsuit to proceed. [read post]
