Search for: "In Re Application for Water Rights" Results 61 - 80 of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Native American Rights Fund
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Application of)News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Land & Water section, we feature a couple of articles relating to an effort to nullify a tribal water rights settlement deal. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:52 pm by Don Cruse
Among the Wednesday arguments is the Edwards Aquifer water-rights dispute that could have significant implications for the ability of state government to regulate water use. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 3:54 pm by Jeff Gittins
As part of the lawsuit, Salt Lake City also brought claims to adjudicate and quiet title to water rights in Little Cottonwood Creek, including water claimed by Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by WIMS
State Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Prohibits EPA from superseding a water quality certification (that a discharge will comply with applicable water quality requirements) granted by a state under CWA section 401. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:43 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Human Rights Approach to Regulate Armed Conflicts: Beyond the Lex Generalis/Specialis FrameworkShuichi Furuya & Kyo Arai, Introductory Note Yuval Shany, Human Rights Norms Applicable in the Situation of Armed Conflict — Beyond the Lex Generalis/Lex Specialis Framework — William Schabas, The Right to Life in Armed Conflict Vanessa Murphy & Lindsey Cameron, Gender Bias and International Humanitarian Law: Is… [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 2:38 pm by David Strifling
The Compact’s dispute resolution provisions, though vague in some respects, clearly provide a challenger with the right to such an appeal. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 2:38 pm by David Strifling
The Compact’s dispute resolution provisions, though vague in some respects, clearly provide a challenger with the right to such an appeal. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs next contended that the denial of their preliminary B-PUD application constituted a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 11:07 pm
" Applicant's cancelled registration provided no presumption of an exclusive right to use the mark, and its asserted common law rights based on ten years of use do not yield "any significant right to exclude others from use of the mark. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, Serial No. 86490930 (April 27, 2016) [precedential].Mere Descriptiveness: The record evidence established that the term "blob" refers to a type of air mattress used on bodies of water as a recreational device whereby one is catapulted off the blob when another person jumps onto the other side of the blob. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:56 pm by ihwiner
When you have identified one or more specific lawyers to consider, you may think that you’re “almost there,” but in reality your investigation has only just begun! [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
“People are legitimately scared that by speaking out for their rights and going to marches and assemblies, they’re going to be targeted. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm by Andrew Hamm
The post Petitions of the week: Re-opening church doors and opening evidentiary doors appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:06 am by John L. Welch
" Relevant consumers are likely to believe that Applicant's mark indicates the place where its services originate.The Board therefore concluded that the mark is primarily geographically descriptive of Applicant's services, and it affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: What if the mark were "RIGHT COAST? [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
  Our attorneys assist homeowners and individuals with a range of residential real estate matters, including building permit and variance applications, land use regulations, tax liens, foreclosures, mortgage re-financing, and more. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Bill of Rights, in this instance, would provide a "watered-down" version of what the Fourteenth Amendment provides. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:54 am by Deborah Heller
The NYSDEC noted that the company could re-file the application; however, in order to have the application granted, the company must provide reasonable assurances that construction would meet all water quality standards, particularly mercury and copper. [read post]