Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Sure, the majority opinion here gets 5 votes, so it's clearly the law.But the concurring opinion expressly agrees with Part II of the dissent, which involves "the threshold question of what constitutes an adequate initial inquiry under Cal-ICWA. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 2:42 pm
In re Palmer (2021) 10 Cal.5th 959 In re Lira (2014) 58 Cal.4th 573 Issue: Can a parole period be shifted due to excessive incarceration? [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:39 pm
"You're like a little kid. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:47 pm
But if you do, they're community property. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
(See In re S.B. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1287, 1293, fn. 2.)Although the distinctions between waiver, estoppel, and forfeiture can be significant, the terms are not always used with care. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
"Proving that you're never too young to make a good deal.Here's hoping that V.V. becomes an attorney. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:15 pm
In re H.M., 2008 Cal. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
The post Cal/OSHA Extends COVID-19 Regulation for 2 Years appeared first on HRWatchdog by HRWatchdog. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:00 pm
Co.), 221 Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
We're now using DNA to figure out which kids committed a year-old offense of busting down the door to a HOA clubhouse? [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:11 pm
By contrast, if you're convicted only of a nonviolent offense, indisputably, Prop. 57 applies.But what if you're convicted of both a violent offense (or more of 'em) and also a nonviolent offense (or several)? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:29 am
We're too busy discovering new (legal) lands.Maybe this opinion will give rise to one of those new lands. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:06 am
'Res judicata'. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:08 am
"In Re Marriage of Buie & Neighbors". [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:14 pm
Albeit belatedly.When your case is (as here) very similar to another published opinion by the Court of Appeal, when you're going the other way than that other (published) opinion, and when your opinion critiques the reasoning (or lack thereof) of that prior opinion, then, yeah, you should published your opinion.Or at least that's my view. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:49 pm
You're walking down the street with your buddy. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:14 am
We're happy to give one to you. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:07 am
But if you're a juvenile, the state can also "ground" you (i.e., command "home supervision") for 45 days and make you do "chores" (i.e., spend eight days in the Juvenile Work Project program) as well. [read post]
