Search for: "In Re Court of Appeals of Wisconsin"
Results 61 - 80
of 829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
One recent ruling by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals clearly demonstrates the care and meticulousness that should go into executing a will, and the problems that can arise when such care is not taken. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:01 pm
In the case In Re the Paternity of B.J.M., Appeal No. 2017AP2132 (Wis. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 9:30 pm
Fletcher of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.A very big welcome to my Wisconsin colleague, David Schwartz! [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
The defendant appealed. (1) The Fourth Circuit agreed with the trial court regarding the defendant’s statements and rejected the view that all of the statements and derivative evidence should have been suppressed. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:00 pm
On January 8, 2018, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed course on long-standing precedent regarding the application of the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Compensation Act ("the Act") by allowing a temporary employee to bring a tort claim against his temporary employer. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:00 pm
On January 8, 2018, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed course on long-standing precedent regarding the application of the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Compensation Act ("the Act") by allowing a temporary employee to bring a tort claim against his temporary employer. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:06 pm
IDAHO NEWS COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE: How different types of covenants not to compete are applied in Idaho Article provided by Idaho Employment Law Letter MONTANA NEWS COVENANTS NOT TO COMPETE: Noncompetes: Good consideration required Article provided by Montana Employment Law Letter WISCONSIN NEWS COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE: Wisconsin Court of Appeals strikes down three noncompete agreements Article provided by Wisconsin Employment Law Letter [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
If you live in Wisconsin, they're also a little handbook, since they're the most current synopsis of the "objective bias" and "subjective bias" framework Wisconsin courts use to analyze jury selection issues. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:46 pm
The linked AP article shows that "none of the state's 16 appeals court judges or seven Supreme Court justices signed the petition. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
After the Seventh Circuit affirmed the decision, the Supreme Court remanded and vacated the decision and instructed the lower court to re-examine the issue in light of Williams v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 7:25 pm
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a Wisconsin man claiming a bankruptcy court improperly denied the discharge of $260,000 in student loan debt because it found he wasn’t suffering from an undue hardship. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:58 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and the Ohio 4th District Court of Appeals, supporting the legality of the re-classifications. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm
Rosecky appealed and the court of appeals certified the question to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:12 am
Answering a certified question from an intermediate court of appeals, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that a restrictive covenant signed by a long-time at-will employee on threat of termination was supported by lawful consideration on the employer’s part, i.e., its forbearance of the right to fire an at-will employee. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:26 pm
It was against this backdrop that the Wisconsin and Maryland cases came to the court this term. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
It wasn’t until Goodell needed to appeal a case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court that her gender became an issue. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV: State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit today. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:35 pm
Friedlen, a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision that has been certified for review by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:26 pm
The Court of Appeals decision re-asserted that the states are independent sovereigns in the federal system, and that therefore courts have long presumed that Congress does not cavalierly preempt state-law causes of action. [read post]
