Search for: "In Re Estate of West" Results 61 - 80 of 954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
To keep things in balance, today we're going to talk about a lawyer's troubles with the law. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Oh, the places we're about to go. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:45 am by Russell Knight
The legal description and PIN number of 123 West Bedrock Ave, Chicago, IL 60602 are attached hereto as Exhibit A. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:44 pm
They're going to knock NE Multnomah Boulevard down from five car lanes to three: A road diet project for Multnomah Blvd emerged from a public process designed to develop a high-quality east-west bikeway through the Lloyd District on NE Holladay. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
And speaking of the west side of bridges, we're still puzzled by the infamous "new courthouse" project. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:43 pm
As Costa Mesa commercial real estate loan modification lawyers, we're not surprised to see that the West is hurting. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:02 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Sun Sentinel] * If you’re in the market for an apartment, we hear Brooklyn Law School just sold a bunch of its student housing to a real estate developer. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Weste (Helen[1]), appeals from the Chancery Division's August 8, 2014 order that: discharged Halkovich as administratrix CTA[2]of Helen's estate; ordered Halkovich to provide a full inventory and accounting of the estate's assets; admitted Helen's 2002 last will and testament (the 2002 will) to probate; and appointed Helen's neighbor, John Brek, as executor under the terms of the 2002 will. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 3:03 pm
§ 31-15-7-4(a)(1)-(3) (West 1998) empowers courts to dispose of the following three classifications of property of the parties: Property owned by either spouse prior to the marriage; property acquired by either spouse in his or her own right after the"IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF MECHELLE K. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:36 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
The spark that lead to the current iteration of the statute was the Florida supreme court’s ruling in In re Estate of Platt, 586 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1991), which concluded that probate courts could not — as a matter of law — approve attorney’s fees based solely on a fixed percentage of the value of the estate. [read post]