Search for: "In Re Estrada" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 3:34 am
Estrada showed that the involved goods travel through the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:11 pm by Steve Kalar
“Evolving” is a good description – since the 2008 Estrada-Espinozaen banc decision, the Ninth (with some welcome guidance from the Supremes in Descamps) has defined and redefined this particularly tricky offense. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:01 pm by Douglas Marques
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:06 am by The Swartz Law Firm
Estrada, Defendant Rudy Estrada pled guilty to illegal re-entry after being deported subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
Estrada, the Board found the designation SHRIMP COTIJA SPRING ROLLS to be generic for "Dinner rolls, spring rolls and rolls containing shrimp, vegetables and cheese. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
Gerardi: Muerte en el vecindario de Dios Julie López F&G Editores (Guatemala City 2012) The Art of Political Murder: Who Killed the Bishop? [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:57 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Emérito Estrada-Rivera, 722 F.3d 50 In re Rivera, 494 B.R. 101 (BAP 1st Cir. 2013) Panel 2 – Key Mainland Decisions Additional Reference Materials Castleton Plaza, LP, 707 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2013) Wooley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
 District court judges -- since they're solo -- will not have "coalition" problems. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
“You don’t really think we’re going to go back and rip out every decision made,” Scalia said. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
“You don’t really think we’re going to go back and rip out every decision made,” Scalia said. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
One of those bars is Section 2(c).The panel majority distinguished the only case in which implied consent under Section 2(c) had been found: In re D.B. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
The President re-nominated him in January 2013, and he was confirmed in May. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 am by Gustavo Arballo
El resultado -cuanto menor, mejor- será una aproximación a la opinión que al lector le merezca la actuación de la Corte -una opinión que tenga en cuenta todo el campeonato y no las perlitas de los resúmenes de la fecha-. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:04 am by John Lewis
”  Undaunted, counsel for Comcast, Miguel Estrada, disagreed, pointing out in rebuttal that Comcast told the district court “the model does not work”, “flaws preclude its use”, and that “this model is bunk”. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:47 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Mollineri – Re-torcid@s (pendiente) 12:00pm – Almuerzo 1:00pm – Blogs Gary Gutierrez – Blog de Gary Luis Ponce – Periodista Perú Erick Álvarez – abogado y escritor 2:00pm – Facebook + Twitter / Redes Sociales José Raúl Cepeda – Profesor Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico Noticias Ponce (pendiente) 3:00pm – Periodismos Culturales Aileen Estrada – Catedrática Medios y Cultura… [read post]