Search for: "In Re Florida Evidence Code"
Results 61 - 80
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 5:09 am
Alan Gold of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a 113 page opinion and order quashing the bankruptcy court's order requiring the lenders involved in TOUSA, Inc.' [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:56 am
If you can prove undue influence, that same evidence should control the outcome of your inheritance case regardless of whether or not you’re litigating a will contest governed by F.S. 732.5165, a joint account case governed by F.S. 655.79, or a POD account case governed by Florida common law. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:40 pm
It’s code for limiting financial judgments plaintiffs may receive. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
Code § 1343”. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:40 pm
During the phase of a Florida criminal case known as “discovery”, the State discloses the evidence and witnesses it would use against you or your loved one at trial in a document titled “State’s Discovery Exhibit. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
In re Estate of Pittston, 2009-Ohio-1862 (5th Dist.) [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
” Although the trial judge expressed doubts as to whether Officer Munecas’s “testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data[,] is the product of reliable principles and methods, and whether he has applied the reliable principles and methods in this case[,]” the judge ruled that the testimony was admissible under of the Daubert standard by the 2013 amendments to the Florida Evidence Code. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:45 am
The children argued that Decedent’s Will did not contain language evidencing his intent to exclude his five other unnamed children from inheriting; therefore, contestants were entitled to an intestate share of their father’s estate pursuant to Oklahoma’s probate code (similar to Florida’s probate code). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:09 am
Alan Gold of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a 113 page opinion and order quashing the bankruptcy court's order requiring the lenders involved in TOUSA, Inc.'s Transeastern joint venture to disgorge, as fraudulent transfers under Section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code, settlement monies that they had received on July 31, 2007 in repayment of their existing debt and to pay prejudgment interest on such monies, for a total… [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Evidence Code, No. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
” In re Adoption of Holland, 965 So.2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citing § 63.042(1), Fla. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 9:28 am
[See In re Amendments to Florida Evidence Code, 144 So.3d 536, 536–537 (Mem) (Fla.2014).] [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Janes, 878 So.2d 440, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“The 2002 amendment to section 733.107, adding subsection 2, was intended to incorporate sections 90.301–90.304 of the Florida Evidence Code, and require a shifting of the burden of proof after the presumption of undue influence arises in a will contest. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Then earlier this year, the Florida Supreme Court in the per curiam ruling of In re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, decided NOT to adopt the Daubert standard – even though the legislature had passed a law enacting it – for two reasons: Concerns regarding the constitutionality of the amendment; Procedural concerns with the law creating a section that isn’t part of the state’s evidence code. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm
The court also characterized the provisions of section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (1993) as "more stringent requirements" than section 71.011, Florida Statutes (1995).The Court explained that pursuant to section 90.953, Florida Statutes, (2002), Florida's code of evidence, the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure must present the original promissory note as a duplicate of a note is not admissible. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
In re Trinity M.H. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:45 am
The victims in these cases aren’t simpletons; they’re normal human beings acting exactly as one would expect them to act when targeted for exploitation at a time that they’re suffering from a cognitive or emotional impairment. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 8:50 am
We have the Uniform Commercial Code, Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, Model Penal Code and other model laws that are identical (or nearly so) from state to state. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is In re SNP Boat Service SA (Bankr. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:56 am
In re Cook, Case No. 11-50287 [read post]
