Search for: "In Re Interest of CDA"
Results 61 - 80
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
True, and yet even the federal government does not always get it right, as in the case of the CDA. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
If you’re interested in such things, I hope you’ll read the entire opinion. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
So the CDA’s textual inconsistency only “strains credulity” if one completely ignores the legislative manufacturing process that created the CDA. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
One was Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
But we’re guessing that the Government may not be happy with this result. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am
If you’re limiting the claim, it should be integrated with the claim itself: no separate disclosure required. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
Much like the gun-sale groups, they scatter and then re-form within a short period of time. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
The immunity for the 17200 UCL claim is particularly interesting. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
At CDA, we wanted to acquire and distribute the data. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm
While 512 is interesting, at the end of the day it’s all about money. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
Citing Furber and Shiamili, the court says "merely encouraging defamatory posts is not sufficient to defeat CDA immunity. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
I just came across another interesting example, from the recent Florida same-sex adoption decision, In re Matter of Adoption of X.X.G. and N.R.G (emphasis added): The Department says that there are disturbingly high domestic violence rates among same-sex couples. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
” [Cite to In re Zoom] Finally, the CDA does not require Stratics to distribute content over the internet. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
That’s the world I believe we’re living in. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
Thus, the court summarizes: Given the clarity of the plain language of the amendment of the CDA, and the ambiguity of the legislative history relied upon by Plaintiff, the Court thus finds that the CDA does apply to state law civil sex trafficking claims A different court (ML v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
The precedent and language from CDA/COPA cases has now stifled the d [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
Specific Media, In re Doubleclick, Cohen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:09 am
” (So apparently they’re both likely consumers whose confusion is relevant and defendants? [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:22 am
Interesting! [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
Specific Media, In re Doubleclick, Cohen v. [read post]
