Search for: "In Re Interest of Joshua"
Results 61 - 80
of 519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2012, 8:43 am
Interesting issue re standardized client initiative – how might SCI be used in work-based learning schemes. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:14 pm
How about this as a fundraiser for public interest scholarships? [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Bowers and Joshua T. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas We have compiled a list of the top 2011 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:10 am
That’s exactly what we’re going to talk about here. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 11:27 am
Greg Lambert 1:08 Interesting I am, I am actually going to kind of give it a pass. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
This quasi-arbitration/divorce settlement brings in some interesting concessions, and somehow they keep Mr. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:04 pm
[This guest post is by Joshua Wright (George Mason University) and Geoffrey Manne (International Center for Law & Economics), who blog regularly at Truth on the Market] We’ve been reading with interest a bit of a blog squabble between Tim Wu and Adam Thierer (see here and here) set off by Professor Wu’s WSJ column: “In the Grip of the New Monopolists. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
By Professor Joshua Sarnoff, Assistant Director of the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic and a Practitioner-in-Residence at the Washington College of Law, American University. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:40 pm
And we’re very excited. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm
Nichols, an experimental philosopher at the University of Arizona, and his Yale colleague Joshua Knobe. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
Once you, dear reader, have chosen to read a blog at that level of specialization and that level of professional editing — i.e., the professional is the one deciding on the content — either you're interested or you're not, and if you're interested, you're interested enough to at least skim each post's title to see if you want to read more. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
JOSH: The choices, you know, it’s interesting. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:32 pm
We have two interesting posts from the realm of food safety, with Shawn Stevens commenting on the possibility of a beef hamburger without the cow and Bill Marler has insight on Cargill's continued problems with E.coli and Salmonella. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
Kagan’s constitutional law classes before White House Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest intervened. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 4:57 pm
It's always great to see members of the LexBlog Network not only sharing interesting news but also offering their opinion on why that news matters, what they take issue with, and what it means for their practice area. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
Not only are agencies not bound by a court’s prior interpretations of an ambiguous statute – they’re not even bound by their own prior interpretations! [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
Our friend, Joshua Stein, asked real-estate attorneys what they thought of the Court of Appeals's decision in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:51 am
For those who are interested, I filed an amicus brief in support of Petitioner KSR Int'l. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:59 am
— Sir Joshua Reynolds. [read post]
