Search for: "In Re Jessica W."
Results 61 - 80
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
Reverse anthropology: look at things w/logic of local people. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 11:31 am
Jessica T. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Introduction: Jessica Litman: US judges and lawyers think what they’re doing is directed at what actual consumers perceive, but the Q is how you figure that out. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Abraham Drassinower & Jessica Silbey: if all you’re about is incentives, then there’s really just one entity, TM/©/patent/IP. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Began w/Ken Port’s Mitchell Study on TM Litigation—2972 cases; adding stock prices to it; pulling out cases w/o a publicly traded party. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
EU TM runs in parallel w/national system. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:22 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jessica Bowling v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:02 am
Carolina Club at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cost: Free, Lunch provided Faculty Lead: Jessica Smith, W. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 5:04 pm
Fisher III, Jessica Litman, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Tarleton Gillespie, and James Boyle. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
[Possibly Jessica Litman’s work on expansion of ©?] [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
W/o a right, there is no no-right/duty to not interfere w/the privilege. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
But if you choose to do so, you’re no longer totally left on your own in Maryland to navigate the intricacies of bankruptcy. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
But if you choose to do so, you’re no longer totally left on your own in Maryland to navigate the intricacies of bankruptcy. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:13 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jessica Bowling v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
They’re not doing step 2 in any event. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:48 am
Update 7:50 pm: CBS calls South Carolina and W. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm
The complete absence of any opportunity for judicial review to assess a risk of re-offending, which is beyond the norm of Jessica’s law, is arbitrary and cannot be deemed rationally related to the legislature’s stated purpose of protecting the public from those with a high risk of re-offending. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:54 pm
That bill was re-introduced again in 2015, this time seeking to nullify the FCC’s Open Internet Order and prevent the agency from re-issuing the same or similar rule, unless authorized by Congress. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” In practice, many of the gripe cases say they are following First Amendment precedents, only when they’re confronted by a subset of noncommercial speech—that which does not solicit the purchase of the speech itself. [read post]
