Search for: "In Re Little & Ives Co." Results 61 - 80 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It doesn’t express Jony Ives’s personality other than to tell you that he likes modernist design, as many people do.Authenticity and narrative: a S. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
This was new territory for us--so we bought a couple of DSM-IVs. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
”After consulting with Richardson and Ruckelshaus, Bork complied with at least the first part of Nixon’s “direct[ive]. [read post]
21 May 2022, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, there is little information on the underlying facts of the earlier case. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:15 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
It really does little good to submit 4 letter from co-workers only, because the DAAD can simply say, "okay, we're convinced your not drinking at or around work; what about the people you live with, and you friends, and family? [read post]
6 May 2018, 5:06 am by Howard Iken
Vogel has now sought to bring a guardian ad litem and a re-unifications specialist into the case to investigate the claims. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Part IV presents and conclusion that highlights the difficulties with current IP regulation and stress the need for alternatives to follow the goals illustrated in the constitution. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
 “A desaposentação no Regime Geral de Previdência Social (Exlusion from the General Social Security System)”, IV Fórum de Disseminação de Trabalhos de Conclusão do Curso de Direito (Form for the dissemination of completion project of the Law course). [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:50 am
Jean Dodds, Co-Trustee of The Rabies Challenge Fund Dr. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:33 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  The opinion is In re Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd., 53 Haw. 496, 497 P.2d 549 (1972), a case that on the surface involved the rather mundane issue of  Pioneer Mill's application to register land in Hawaii's Land Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm by Bexis
”  Except where FDA regulations (allegedly) by their own terms allowed modifications, there wasn’t a majority on the Court for letting the common law go there.We’re now a little more than a year into the post-Levine era, and already it looks like the other side (definitely) and the courts (all too often) are ignoring the implicit limits of Levine. [read post]