Search for: "In Re Marriage of Powers"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
In In re the Marriage of Suzanne Paulsen and Timothy Paulsen, (WA App., March 19, 2914), a Washington state appeals court upheld a trial court's parenting plan that was entered along with a decree dissolving the marriage of the Paulsens. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:39 pm
In other ways marriage is a civil ceremony bound merely by an officiant who has the power to bind people by law as husband and wife to... [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Children, being natural conformists, tend to be upset upon discovering that they’re not in [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:14 am
According to Colorado Revised Statute 14-2-109, a marriage may be solemnized by a judge of a court; by a court magistrate; by a retired judge of the court; by a public official whose powers include solemnization of marriages; by Indian tribe officials; by clergy; by the parties to the marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
It is hard to imagine a similar re-imagination of Obergefell as a decision that thwarts rather than serves gay liberation. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Nixon’s marriage in January 2018. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
In addition to their powers as judicial officials in civil and criminal actions, magistrates are authorized by G.S. 7A-292(9) to perform marriage ceremonies. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
But it’s a whole lot easier if you’re married. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:10 pm
But the same-sex marriage case—known as the Perry trial, after lead plaintiff Kristin M. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Muhammad Munir, Some Reflections on the Story of Banu Quraydha: A Re-Evaluation, (May 1, 2014).Akiva A. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm
Fatemi, LLC to provide you with knowledgeable advice and powerful advocacy. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:22 am
You break connection when you move into power. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1890 decision in In re Burrus, it has been understood that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over at least some issues of “domestic relations” law. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:54 am
Knowledge is power. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:36 am
Ann Althouse, meanwhile, thinks the answer is "No, because they're not stupid and they want to stay in power. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
Justice Kennard was part of the 4-3 majority in the Marriage Cases decision from May 15, and I was concerned that without her vote it would be difficult to prevail here. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Although Corbett said he thought that appealing would likely be futile, it is hard to believe he did not also have public opinion in mind, as he is currently in the midst of a re-election campaign. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:12 pm
Rick Bickhram: You're absolutely right here, Dave. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:30 pm
That seems to be the essence of a recent appellate decision out of the Second Appellate District, Division One, in In re Marriage of Murchison (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 847. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:30 pm
That seems to be the essence of a recent appellate decision out of the Second Appellate District, Division One, in In re Marriage of Murchison (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 847. [read post]
