Search for: "In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 7:16 am
Merrill Lynch, which Sotomayor probably got  right and the Supreme Court  (reversing) probably got wrong. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:20 pm
Rising wages in China aren't new, says Bank of America-Merrill Lynch economist Ethan Harris. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm by Barry Barnett
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 672 F.3d 482, 491 (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
While Merrill Lynch, which was hired by the Teppco Audit Committee to provide a fairness opinion on the Pioneer Sale, opined that the $38 million purchase price was fair, Merrill Lynch did not consider Teppco’s rights under the processing contract after the Jonah acquisition. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
Financial-services giants including Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley and Ameriprise Financial Inc. have them on staff as well. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Mandelman
  I’d say it’s long since time for them to shut the hell up, we know you’re all liars and we’re done listening to you. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:55 am by Heather Young
Incorporated, Goldman Sachs & Co., Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., Bank of America Securities LLC, Bank of New York, Citigroup Inc., Credit Suisse (USA) Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and UBS Financial Services, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
See In re Int'l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 675 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:17 pm
As for a government-backed Godzilla such as Bank of America Corp., which kept investors in the dark about most of the losses at Merrill Lynch & Co. last year until after its purchase was completed, it's an open question if the SEC would dare lift a finger. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:03 am by Beth Graham
See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d at 739–40; In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 195 S.W.3d at 816. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Kennedy to Use of Bogash, 301 U.S. 389, 393 (1937); Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Kennedy to Use of Bogash, 301 U.S. 389, 393 (1937); Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
"[24]     Additionally, a defendant does not need to purchase or sell actual securities to be found liable, which is also a much broader provision than under the federal securities laws.[25] Further, the Martin Act does not require "proof of intent to defraud, reliance, or damages" to establish misdemeanor liability; felony liability does require proof of intent but not customer reliance.[26] Unlike the SEC, which only possesses civil litigation… [read post]