Search for: "In Re Pension Cases"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 10:00 am
But examining the current crop of cases by public employees and retirees challenging pension-reform laws—there are at least a dozen such cases just in 2013 so far—shows that the Contract Clause (as well as similar state constitutional Contract Clauses) nonetheless remains a vibrant area of litigation. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 7:15 am
When Can a Party Re-Open a Rhode Island Divorce Case? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:48 pm
Berryhill (10th Cir., June 13, 2017) (affirming denial of Lopez's fee application under the Equal Access to Justice Act following his successful appeal; the decision appealed from, however, was substantially justified despite its being wrong)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
They’re usually successful.) [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:24 pm
Berryhill (10th Cir., February 21, 2017) (reversing denial of disability benefits because the administrative law judge erred by failing to give appropriate weight to Lewis's treating physician)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 6:39 pm
(U.S. employer), because of foreign employer Mahalaxmi's failure to establish that Mahalaxmi and Karats are "affiliates")*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 6:15 am
"This case is effectively bribery. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:44 pm
Counsel argued that the case presents an issue not before the Court in In re Pension Reform. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 3:03 pm
The following are some Indiana cases dealing with vesting of property.IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ELKINS (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002; text version): "Pursuant to Ind. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The court’s opinion in In re Yellow Corporation illustrates a willingness for the bankruptcy court to apply a thoughtful case-by-case analysis in considering whether to keep a dispute even where a competing federal statute mandating arbitration exists. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm
School District No. 1 (10th Cir., March 28, 2018) (affirming dismissal of Johnson's complaint based on Colorado Supreme Court decision regarding state property interest in salary and benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:49 am
As always, we’re here to help. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:09 am
Frommert rejects the “one-strike-and-you’re-out” rule, awarding a home run to Xerox as sponsor of a defined benefit pension plan. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:31 am
Garrett appealed to the Appellate Division, which decided that the OAL needs to re-hear the case and finally answer the question. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:19 pm
It discusses the firm’s client Theodore Rapp and his pension case that McKennon Law Group PC litigated and in which our client obtained a very favorable result. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:01 pm
In Re: TD Banknorth Shareholders Litigation, C.A. 2557-VCL (Del. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 9:45 am
These plans don't have much motivation to pay benefits when they're due. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
In re Marriage of Hall. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:28 pm
In re: Radcliffe, No. 08-2885 (4/23/09). [read post]
