Search for: "In Re R.S" Results 61 - 80 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 11:37 am by Jamison Koehler
Court of Appeals previously interpreted the term “significant bodily injury” in 2010 opinion, In re R.S., 6 A.3d 854 (D.C. 2010): “The threshold for significant bodily injury is markedly less severe than that required for aggravated assault. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:59 pm by Don Cruse
The Beaumont Court of Appeals cited Wikipedia in a 2009 decision, In re K.E.L., No. 09-08-00014-CV (Tex. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
ARBITRABILITY OF HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS: FAA PREEMPTION AND MFA REVERSE PREEMPTION IN THE MED-MAL CONTEXT In an opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court holds that the federal law that accords states the right to regulate the business of insurance (McCarran-Ferguson Act) does not furnish an exception to the general principle that the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) preempts the TAA (Texas Arbitration Act) and other state arbitration laws when the two conflict, where the… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am by MOTP
In the Note, James agreed to re-pay Moncor $10,690.37 in principal, plus interest, with her monthly payment set at $171.82. [read post]