Search for: "In Re Royalty Y."
Results 61 - 76
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
Landeshauptmann von Wien (IPKat) Spain refers two design infringement questions to Court of Justice: Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The settlement agreement extended the licensing agreement and provided for, inter alia, minimum royalties over a period of years, a means to determine the amount of royalties, a business plan, cooperation concerning the motion picture, and releases. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Deixler here, you’re plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Innovationpartners) WTO session on GIs, Part of Doha ‘final countdown’ (IP Watch) Global – Copyright Final version of ACTA posted (Michael Geist) (IP Watch) Australia AusPat beta launched (The Patent Librarian’s Notebook) Brazil FIFA, INPI meet re World Cup 2014 and trademarks (IP tango) Canada AC’s ‘Draft Statement of Interim Royalties to Be Collected by the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)’ (Excess Copyright)… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:17 pm
It has been sampled many times for re-use in other songs. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Biorenewable monomers take centre stage (IPKat) US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit extends scope of 102(e) ‘secret prior art’: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) (Patentology) (Inventive Step) District Court erroneously gives claim term two different constructions in a single claim: Haemonetics Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
They didn't laugh - they were just irritated when they realized nothing was going to happen, and they haven't fogotten it 30 years later: they're still angry. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
There needs to be a re-education of these countries that currently do not value intellectual property rights as they should. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 pm
Reasonable royalties to both. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 2:53 am
And I just said, from looking this up, from what I’ve seen before, if you get a real excessive amount, you’re just going to be shoved out. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:09 am
., 331 F.3d 13, 22 (2d Cir. 2003); In re Napster Inc., 2005 WL 1287611 at 10-11, 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1833, 2005 Copr. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:27 am
The court found this fatal to Lucent's case:[B]y filing claims to New Work in the same application as claims to Existing Technology, the patent is jointly owned by AT&T and Fraunhofer. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:00 pm
S-A-T-U-R-D-A-Y night! [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:46 pm
En cualquier caso, este puede ser eventualmente un fundamento para demandar a Xerox si me electrocuto con una fotocopiadora, pero no para demandarlos porque con esos artefactos fotocopiaron mis libros y pierdo royalties. [read post]
