Search for: "In Re Sherman" Results 61 - 80 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2009, 3:46 pm
The panel will focus on Hollywood labor issues related to new media.Sponsored by Zocalo and moderated by LA Times Editorial Board Member Jon Healey, panelists include AFTRA National Executive Director Kim Roberts Hedgepeth, actress Kathryn Joosten, actor Ron Ostrow, UCLA Law professor David Ginsburg, Veoh Founder and Chief Innovation Officer Dmitry Shapiro, and TroyGould entertainment attorney Jonathan Handel.The panel starts at 7:30 at the ArcLight Sherman Oaks, 15301 Ventura Blvd.,… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm by markshermanlaw
The post 3 Things to Know if You’re Arrested for Threatening Second Degree in Connecticut appeared first on The Law Offices of Mark Sherman. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 2:23 pm
I’ll be in the way guys yell when they’re mad. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:44 pm
  They're apparently just fine to pass on the costs to all of use, and we're happy to pay them.But don't worry. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:54 pm
But like Maria behind the wheel of Sherman's Mercedes, we should watch where we're going or we're going to get in trouble.But I like to think that interpretation is the frisky wild animal. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Motion Picture Patents Co. on October 1, 1915, with the MPPC found to violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
The respondents in In re Vitamin C are Chinese manufacturers and exporters of Vitamin C that have been accused of anti-competitive behavior in violation of the Sherman Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
The Court found the claims would have been viable under the Sherman Act had they not been assigned.The opinion is available in pdf. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:15 am
" Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
District Court for the Southern District of California has granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ antitrust claim under Section One of the Sherman Act in In re: National Association of Music Merchants, Musical Instruments and Equipment Antitrust Litigation. [read post]