Search for: "In Re Sherman"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 10:00 am
The Ninth Circuit recognized that Section 1 of the Sherman Act targets concerted action “in restraint of trade. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:00 pm
So you know, this would be if your firm to go you know, what we’re really good at, we’re good at making mid size and compact sedans. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:25 pm
And there’s really no explanation for how the agency means to parse, say, unlawful mergers (under the Sherman and/or Clayton acts) from lawful ones, whether they are to do with AI or not. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:01 am
They're applying for mortgages online. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
In addition, the available results don’t all impugn noncompetes; they’re mixed. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
At the very end, if they were to have standing and to prove harm, there would be the question of whether they're entitled to an injunction. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:17 pm
Among the givers, there are plenty of strong givers (folks like Des Pieri, Chaya Pomeranz-Sherman, and Cait Brumme). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
A case involving the ability of high-level professional sports teams from non-US countries to play league matches in the US has re-emerged. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
In the antitrust context, group boycotts, or concerted refusals to deal, may run afoul of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Here's the pushback from Justice Kagan during the Gonzalez argument: "we're a court. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
“We took considerable time and effort with partners, customers and our team to consider what we truly offer,” said Sherman. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
There are no more Sherman Act claims, and no more claims that are specifically about the licensing of FRAND-pledged standard-essential patents (SEPs).The question is where to go from here. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
[Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.] [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Wagner’s question, Doug Ellenoff, a partner at Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, replied that there is a “troubling coordinated narrative we’re hearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
But that doesn't mean they're wrong: it's a problem of Google's own making. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
Cal.): Plaintiffs' Responses to Minute Order QuestionsIn Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-2981-JD, N.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Justin Sherman, a first-timer on the podcast, covers recent research showing that alleged Russian social media interference had no meaningful effect on the 2016 election. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
We're going to learn a lot more about Elon Musk from how he deals with that crisis than from anything he's tweeted in recent months. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
If you’re already an expert, feel free to scroll down to the “Hi” image. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Pepper (App Store antitrust case), but it wasn't because a narrow Supreme Court majority determined that app downloaders directly purchase from Apple.Upon remand, the class-action lawyers drastically narrowed their case: it's now only about California law (the Cartwright Act, which is sort of California's Sherman Act, and California Unfair Competition Law (UCL))--and the class is now limited to California consumers. [read post]
