Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 61 - 80
of 9,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2013, 11:49 am
You just finished reading Save the Date: Copyright Matters Program on Monday, July 29, 2013! [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm
The first is a letter from Judge Newman's counsel in the action brought by the Judge's complaint filed in D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 11:41 am
On the matter of English history, the D.C. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:29 am
The post D.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
And secondly, the case had garnered national headlines, which in some cases prompts judges (and prosecutors, for that matter) to make examples out of the defendants. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:01 pm
No one ever told me he was gay, and I had no thoughts on the subject matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 6:41 am
Immigration Impact reports that, according to an internal government document, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) deployed more than 700 personnel in the Washington, D.C. area alone to protests of police violence in the wake of the killing of George... [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
The Aftermath The Bachleitner matter appears to be the first time that a D.C. jury has imposed liability on a bar based solely on the “consumption” prong of the Dram Shop statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
The Aftermath The Bachleitner matter appears to be the first time that a D.C. jury has imposed liability on a bar based solely on the “consumption” prong of the Dram Shop statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
The Aftermath The Bachleitner matter appears to be the first time that a D.C. jury has imposed liability on a bar based solely on the “consumption” prong of the Dram Shop statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
The Aftermath The Bachleitner matter appears to be the first time that a D.C. jury has imposed liability on a bar based solely on the “consumption” prong of the Dram Shop statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:31 am
The D.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:23 am
The web page of the District of Columbia Bar has posted informal admonitions issued to attorneys in three matters. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
April 28, 2011), the D.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:45 am
No matter what political party you’re in, that’s something we can all agree on. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:13 am
D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
D.C., 976 A.2d 173 (D.C. 2009), accord, Walker & Boyd v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:37 am
The D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:10 am
The D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 7:40 am
The matter must have moved promptly, as the Board report recommending that the court accept his consent is not yet available on the D.C. [read post]
