Search for: "In The Matter Of: L.R"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:07 pm
Goodfellow (1870), L.R. 5 Q.B. 549 a case frequently cited by Canadian courts on capacity to make a will (I wrote a post on the Banks case here). [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
It is from this order that the matter reached this Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
William Alsup denying [1222] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Incorporation by reference in building contracts By Thomas G. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:07 am
L.R. did not appear. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:27 am
In Re Hill (1870), L.R. 2 P & D. 89 (P.D.), the Court stated: “It is a general rule…that when a person dies domiciled in a foreign country, and the Court of that country invests anybody, no matter when, with the right to administer the estate, this Court ought to follow the grant simply because it is the grant of a foreign court, without investigating the grounds on which it was made, and without reference to the principles on which grants are made in this… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
The Courts in Ontario will make the grant to an estate trustee who is recognized by the law of the domicile without inquiry into matters such as validity. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:59 am
In Rajkumar Gurawara (Dead) Through L.Rs vs. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:23 am
Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133, 142 (2d Cir.2001) ("American courts will normally accord considerable deference to foreign adjudications as a matter of comity. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
L.R. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
It is because of the difference in the object and purpose of the Slum Act and the Delhi Rent Control Act that in the decision reported as AIR 1977 SC 789 Lal Chand (dead) by L.Rs. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 pm
Order at 2, quoting L.R. 83.13(a). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm
Perfulla Kumar Chatterjee (dead) by L.Rs. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Raghubir Singh (Dead) by L.Rs. (1989) 2 SCC 754, this Court held that the plea for reconsideration is not to be entertained merely because the petitioner chooses to reagitate the points concluded by the earlier decision in Sub-committee on Judicial Accountability. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
According to the case details on the Supreme Court website, the hearing will consider the Rule itself by addressing its limitations and its compatibility with the rule against double proof which states that there can only be one dividend in respect of what is substantially the same debt (In re Oriental Commercial Bank (1871) L.R. 7 Ch. [read post]
