Search for: "In re: Adoption of Scott W. V." Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
In the interests of maintaining that success, we offfer here a state-by-state break down of the precedent refusing to adopt “fraud on the market” or similar presumed reliance theories to state-law (not federal - no RICO or antitrust cases here) causes of action – everything from product liability to consumer fraud to state securities and other statutes. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm by Raymond McKenzie
When last confronted with this issue, we relied on In re Clarke’s Will, 198 Md. 266, 81 A.2d 640, Austin W. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
To adopt plaintiff's arguments here would read the words "and served" out of the statute.Id. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Hedgepath, 607 A.2d 1238, 1247 & n.8 (D.C. 1992) (adopting permissive rationale of Doe v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Most states have adopted some sort of legislative purpose limitation on the use of negligence per se. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Scott Horton, A Question for December 7 (December 8, 2006)57. [read post]